Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 08.06.2016, 10:21 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Dowland: > On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 10:25:07AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > Thanks for the offer. It would be great if I have more hands to help with > > migrating git.debian.org > > Whoah there. Running an official Debian gitlab instance is one thing, migrating > git.debian.org is quite another. Did I miss where there was consensus on this? it was a misunderstanding that went this way: * Someone wanted gitlab.debian.org. * Someone pointed out that d.o services should be named by task, not implementation. * Someone figured that the task provided by gitlab is git hosting, hence understood the above as a suggestion to use git.debian.org. * Someone concluded that therefore, we need to consider a migration from git.debian.org to gitlab. * And then, because git.debian.org is run by alioth, someone started talking about alioth. The problem was between step 2 and 3. Two suggestsions: * Consider gitlab.debian.org. Gitlab is not “just some implementation” that can be swapped for another, so it is ok to name the service according to that. Just like we have jenkings.debian.org. * If that is not acceptable, consider something like projects.debian.org as gitlab is about (git-centric) hosting of projects. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim “nomeata” Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org • https://people.debian.org/~nomeata XMPP: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de • GPG-Key: 0xF0FBF51F https://www.joachim-breitner.de/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part