Re: Packaging of static libraries
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 07:12:05PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 09:05:36AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > whether it is advisable to try hard to provide static libraries even if
> > upstream build system does not easily provide both.
> Note that it's only a wishlist severity bug if you don't provide it.
I do not mind about the severity of the bug (since IMHO also wishlist
bugs should be closed). My point was that to my understanding people
are misunderstanding policy when giving the advise to ignore static