[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Priorities overrides? Extra?



Note that you mix two completely different questions in your email.

On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 02:22:54PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
> http://ftp.debian.org/debian/indices/override.stretch.main.gz
> 
> I find there more than 48.000 overrides; which means that almost *all*
> packages are overridden.
> 
> What is the reason for that? I would expect that overriding is something
> exceptional, but not the common way to set the priority?
I guess that's an implementation detail of the archive software. Priority
fields in the packages are only informational, that's all.

> Looking into the priorities, I found:
> 
>      66 required
>      64 important
>      86 standard
>   34854 optional
>   13191 extra
> 
> which means that almost one third of the packages is priority
> "extra". From the policy, I would expect that the main reasons to give
> the priority "extra" are either a conflict with another package, or the
> dependency on a package with priority "extra".
One of the other reasons is dh_make(1). It was broken by a stupid (IMO)
#373603 in 2006 and fixed back by #706164 in 2013. Yet another one is the
bad policy wording about "likely to be useful if you already know what
they are" (see #660249 about dropping that).

See also #759260 for discussions about dropping extra completely.

-- 
WBR, wRAR

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: