[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Packaging of static libraries

On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 05:57:16PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > whether it is advisable to try hard to provide static libraries even if
> > > upstream build system does not easily provide both.
> > Note that it's only a wishlist severity bug if you don't provide it.
> I do not mind about the severity of the bug (since IMHO also wishlist
> bugs should be closed).  My point was that to my understanding people
> are misunderstanding policy when giving the advise to ignore static
> library.
If you want to provide them it's fine, I don't think anybody will stop you
(and if there are reasons, we should update the policy). You are just not
obliged to do that work if you don't have enough resources or it's too


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: