Re: Ideas to improve dpkg/ucf with hooks
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Marc Haber wrote:
> I am aware of that. That's one of my reasons for advocating giving the
> needed love to ucf and to deprecate dpkg's conffile functions in favor
> of ucf. A extended / enhanced ucf can replace dpkg with a lot less
> work than would be necessary to bring dpkg's conffile handling into
> the 2020ies decade.
I note that merging ucf into dpkg is on the dpkg roadmap:
https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Dpkg/RoadMap
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Reply to: