Re: Ideas to improve dpkg/ucf with hooks
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 11:39:25 +0100, Alexandre Detiste
<alexandre.detiste@gmail.com> wrote:
>But adding dynamic file support in dpkg is a lot of work.
I am aware of that. That's one of my reasons for advocating giving the
needed love to ucf and to deprecate dpkg's conffile functions in favor
of ucf. A extended / enhanced ucf can replace dpkg with a lot less
work than would be necessary to bring dpkg's conffile handling into
the 2020ies decade.
Greetings
Marc
--
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834
Reply to: