On 2015-08-27 14:57, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:12:41PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: >> * ddebs are Debian packages with the extension .deb that >> contain debugging symbols and are built implicitly. >> - A package foo_1.23.deb will receive a corresponding >> foo_1.23-dbgsym.deb package. > > Are they named .deb or .ddeb? > That would be ".deb" with a single "D" - sorry for the copy-waste mistake. I should probably start calling them dbgsym or adbg (for "automatic debug" packages) instead to avoid confusion. :) > One question remains: Can we move non-automatic build dbgsum packages[1] > to the special debug suite as well? Even after the recent change to not > automatically move them? > > Thanks, > Bastian > > [1]: linux for example needs to handle them specially, as they need to > contain unstripped binaries instead of detached debugging infos and > there is no support for build-ids. > Technically, yes. I also /suspect/ that the FTP masters would agree with it (but I cannot speak on their behalf). On the technical side, it is will be a simple matter of adding a field with a given value in your -dbg package. Thanks, ~Niels
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature