Re: How to avoid stealth installation of systemd?
At Wed, 2 Jul 2014 00:13:31 +0100,
Wookey wrote:
>
> +++ Lars Wirzenius [2014-07-01 18:34 +0100]:
> > On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 04:23:01PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
> > > You get a choice of 'prevent-systemd' which stops it running as init
> > > but allows the -shim and libpam packages so that logind and the like
> > > will work. Or 'systemd-must-die' which conflicts with everything
> > > systemdish.
> >
> > Wookey,
> >
> > Please rename the systemd-must-die package to something neutral. Thank
> > you.
>
> OK. I did rename the source package, but I liked the binary and thought
> anyone else who actually wanted this would enjoy it too, so it seemed
> appropriate despite not being entirely 'PC'.
>
> I think some people are failing to see the humour in this name
> (and Dawkins knows we could use some humour round this subject), but I
> guess if it's not going to be allowed then it's not going to be
> allowed.
Yes, I also completely fail to see the humour, especially in the light
of other remarks made on this list by the author of the
systemd-must-die package[0]. I just can't stop making the connection
between the statement that systemd *must* die and that suggestion...
[0] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/05/msg00585.html
Reply to: