Re: systemd, fstab, noauto and nofail
]] Jonas Smedegaard
> Quoting Russ Allbery (2014-11-22 18:01:12)
> > I also like the idea of not having ssh depend on all local file
> > systems to be mounted. I think it's going to be pretty rare to have a
> > system that has /lib and /etc mounted but can't start ssh. In theory,
> > that's possible with a split / and /usr, but as we've discussed in
> > other threads, that's an extremely unusual configuration these days.
>
> It surprises me that it is considered "extremely unusual": It is an
> option offered in stable debian-installer without any advanced trickery
> (just select LVM and pick the last option) - I quite commonly use that,
> and would be surprised if I am alone in that.
>
> I pick that option to avoid e.g. video editing that accidentally fills
> $HOME to wreak havoc on postfix processing (only stall local delivery).
How does having /usr on a separate file system help with this? I could
understand if you'd put /var on a separate file system, but /usr won't
help you here.
--
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are
Reply to:
- References:
- Bug#769907: general: non-sysvinit init systems are made of fail
- From: Michal Suchanek <hramrach@gmail.com>
- Re: Bug#769907: general: non-sysvinit init systems are made of fail
- From: Noel Torres <envite@rolamasao.org>
- Re: systemd, fstab, noauto and nofail
- From: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
- Re: systemd, fstab, noauto and nofail
- From: Noel Torres <envite@rolamasao.org>
- Re: systemd, fstab, noauto and nofail
- From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
- Re: systemd, fstab, noauto and nofail
- From: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>
- Re: systemd, fstab, noauto and nofail
- From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
- Re: systemd, fstab, noauto and nofail
- From: Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk>