On 06/05/2014 12:17 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > The current plan was to have the interpreter (of runscripts) called > openrc-run, separated from the rest of OpenRC, so it could be used when > using sysv-rc too. In that way, we could start aggressively replacing > sysv-rc scripts when Jessie is out, if openrc-run becomes a dependency > of sysv-rc. Then the choice of sysv-rc vs openrc would be only about > "the thing who starts stuff", not just sh vs openrc-run. > > But currently, it's only an idea, nobody started implementing it. > > When discussing with one of the upstream (Patrick Lauer, which I'm > hereby adding as Cc) he told me it should be easy. Patrick, would you > have some time for this? Just your explanations will not cut it for > me... Maybe when I get back home we could spend some time hacking > together? :) I went ahead and tried it on my work laptop and it failed to boot (I reported the bug against OpenRC). I may want to (passively) participate in the conversations you guys have. Do you have a mailing list for it ? -- Given the large number of mailing lists I follow, I request you to CC me in replies for quicker response
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature