Re: FDL with no invariant sections
Andreas Tille writes ("Re: FDL with no invariant sections"):
> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 12:07:17PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:19:10AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > I would reupload it as emboss_6.6.0+dfsg2-1.dsc (dfsg2), using the right
> > tar.gz (the one in 6.6.0-1). You don't need an epoch for that.
>
> While this could be considered in general it is probably not worth the
> effort to stress test mirrors and autobuilders with these huge packages
> just for the sake of reintroducing a small piece of documentation which
> is heavily outdated (covering version 2.5 - we are now at 6.6) if we
> know that in about six weeks a new version will be out. I actually was
> that quick with the removal since I assumed that it is not relevant for
> the package any more anyway. It will be back right in time for the next
> Debian release if it remains in the next upstream version.
Do you consider the lack of the DFSG-free manual an RC bug ? If so
perhaps you should file that bug to stop the bad version propagating
to testing.
Ian.
Reply to: