Re: FDL with no invariant sections

To: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
Cc: Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: FDL with no invariant sections
From: Matthias Urlichs <matthias@urlichs.de>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 13:41:14 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20140520114114.GC2055@smurf.noris.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 21371.15899.218917.48160@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
References: <[🔎] 20140520074240.GC6796@an3as.eu> <[🔎] 20140520080902.GV7681@falafel.plessy.net> <[🔎] 20140520081910.GD6796@an3as.eu> <[🔎] 20140520100717.GA12830@cantor.unex.es> <[🔎] 20140520111245.GH6796@an3as.eu> <[🔎] 21371.15899.218917.48160@chiark.greenend.org.uk>

Hi,

Ian Jackson:
> Do you consider the lack of the DFSG-free manual an RC bug ?

Given that the manual describes a version from the stone ages,
comparatively speaking, I wouldn't consider this to be an RC bug.

-- 
-- Matthias Urlichs

Reply to:

References:
- FDL with no invariant sections
  - From: Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>
- Re: FDL with no invariant sections
  - From: Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org>
- Re: FDL with no invariant sections
  - From: Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>
- Re: FDL with no invariant sections
  - From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
- Re: FDL with no invariant sections
  - From: Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>
- Re: FDL with no invariant sections
  - From: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: Redefining critical bug severity (was: how to deal with a missed so bump already uploaded ?)
Next by Date: Re: FDL with no invariant sections
Previous by thread: Re: FDL with no invariant sections
Next by thread: Re: FDL with no invariant sections
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread