Re: FDL with no invariant sections

[Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>]

On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:19:10AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Considering that it is really a false positive - do you think that there
> is much harm done with my stripped upload?  As far as I remember a new
> EMBOSS release is on its way in the next couple of weeks and we can
> reinclude thes files again instead of using an epoch to reactivate the
> old tarball.  What do you think?

I would reupload it as emboss_6.6.0+dfsg2-1.dsc (dfsg2), using the right
tar.gz (the one in 6.6.0-1). You don't need an epoch for that.

After all, testing is supposed to be in an always releaseable state
and the package with the manual removed would propagate to testing in
five days.

Thanks.