Re: systemd - some more considerations
]] Norbert Preining
> Hi Tollef,
>
> On Thu, 03 Apr 2014, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76935
> >
> > That's being moved to systemd.debug instead of overloading debug.
>
> Good news. And please make Kay excuse for his rudeness and ifgnorance.
Why on earth would I do that? I'm not going to spend time and effort on
something like that.
> Thanks for letting us know.
> But why is that not mentioned in the bug report? What is systemd
> maintainers approach to handling bugs??
It's discussed on the development mailing list.
> > > * systemd maintainers (Lennart Poettering) does not care for
> > > segfaults in his code, even if it happens in pid 1.
> > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74589
> >
> > systemd needs cgroups, that's pretty well established. Arguably, it
> > should die with a clearer message.
>
> No, NO NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
>
> *IT*SHOULD*NOT*DIE*!!! It is in PID 1. Please digest that.
Am I understanding you correctly that you don't think there are any
situations where compiling out features from the kernel can lead to pid1
not working would be acceptable?
--
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are
Reply to: