On 2013-10-24 22:24:05, James McCoy wrote: > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 12:57:37AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > > James wrote: > > >On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> wrote: > > >This falsely implies that sticking with Gnome requires replacing the > > >init system. The only requirement is that systemd is installed, not > > >that it is used as the init system. > > > > That may be the case today, but I personally think it's abundantly > > clear from the current path of Gnome development that sooner or later > > it's going to have a hard dependency on using systemd. > > That doesn't contradict what I stated. One can use systemd (the > package) without using systemd (the binary) as PID 1. Why should I have installed packages I'm not using and I don't want to use? I know it's rhetorical question but not all systems are having enough disk space besides I don't like have packages I'm not using on my systems. So it's not a solution to anything just kind a nasty workaround. > I don't see any > reason why Gnome would care what init system is used, while I do see > reasons why they want to use the various other tools that come along > with systemd (the package). -- |_|0|_| | |_|_|0| "Heghlu'Meh QaQ jajVam" | |0|0|0| -------- kuLa --------- | gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x58C338B3 3DF1 A4DF C732 4688 38BC F121 6869 30DD 58C3 38B3
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature