Re: let's split the systemd binary package

To: debian developers <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: let's split the systemd binary package
From: Brian May <brian@microcomaustralia.com.au>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 11:03:07 +1100
Message-id: <[🔎] CAA0ZO6CE9FbsQckf_+kdvyfMaHD1g_r1Zs3uEa=EwnDCMf8rVA@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] CAKTje6EuowOjGds6Koc_dSxP12fRtT8pKsQXtGUT+so7LgXJQw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 1382560241.6924.6.camel@heisenberg.scientia.net> <[🔎] 52683A5F.3090500@physik.fu-berlin.de> <[🔎] 20131023213915.GA12515@virgil.dodds.net> <[🔎] CAA0ZO6CECEd+T=J72ynMYGV2UvNFKBKnYiE1zRvcFmb6NNCW6Q@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20131023232553.GB12515@virgil.dodds.net> <[🔎] CAKNHny_3SbPqaJ37SWiP2y4kSj08==js9oyPMnzfN6sXO3=RSA@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20131024012751.GA7604@virgil.dodds.net> <[🔎] 87bo2fyruk.fsf_-_@qurzaw.varnish-software.com> <[🔎] 20131024134948.GK8539@basil.wdw> <[🔎] 20131024192452.GA29650@bkor.dhs.org> <[🔎] CAA0ZO6BcjsvZYqNa6=BSSLwreMT1UopOyuSad-He3JyaM3OPGw@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] CAKTje6EuowOjGds6Koc_dSxP12fRtT8pKsQXtGUT+so7LgXJQw@mail.gmail.com>

On 25 October 2013 10:25, Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> wrote:

On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 6:52 AM, Brian May wrote:

> gnome-settings-daemon depends on systemd

This is only true on Debian's Linux architectures:

http://sources.debian.net/src/gnome-settings-daemon/3.8.5-2/debian/control#L58

Oh, ok, good, that is what I thought. In another thread I got a response that suggested otherwise.

Reply to:

References:
- systemd effectively mandatory now due to GNOME
  - From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.net>
- Re: systemd effectively mandatory now due to GNOME
  - From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
- Re: systemd effectively mandatory now due to GNOME
  - From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Re: systemd effectively mandatory now due to GNOME
  - From: Brian May <brian@microcomaustralia.com.au>
- Re: systemd effectively mandatory now due to GNOME
  - From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Re: systemd effectively mandatory now due to GNOME
  - From: Matthias Klumpp <mak@debian.org>
- let's split the systemd binary package [Was, Re: systemd effectively mandatory now due to GNOME]
  - From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Re: let's split the systemd binary package
  - From: Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@err.no>
- Re: let's split the systemd binary package
  - From: Marvin Renich <mrvn@renich.org>
- Re: let's split the systemd binary package
  - From: Olav Vitters <olav@vitters.nl>
- Re: let's split the systemd binary package
  - From: Brian May <brian@microcomaustralia.com.au>
- Re: let's split the systemd binary package
  - From: Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: systemd effectively mandatory now due to GNOME
Next by Date: Re: systemd effectively mandatory now due to GNOME
Previous by thread: Re: let's split the systemd binary package
Next by thread: Re: let's split the systemd binary package
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread