Re: let's split the systemd binary package [Was, Re: systemd effectively mandatory now due to GNOME]
On 24/10/13 03:00, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 02:21:25AM +0200, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
>> 2013/10/24 Steve Langasek <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
>> > Well, that's one more reason the init system and the dbus services should be
>> > separated out in the packaging.
>> Some of the services consume functions and features provided by
>> systemd (the init system).
> Which is exactly the kind of embrace-and-extend that Debian should not
> tolerate having foisted on them in the default desktop by an upstream
> pushing an agenda.
How often is the choice of default desktop re-evaluated, and how is this done?