Re: Survey answers part 3: systemd is not portable and what this means for our ports
On 21 July 2013 20:22, The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> I'm saying that it looks to me as if the lock-in to systemd would be
> even stronger than the lock-in to sysvinit, and might well extend to the
> point of even making it harder to implement another new alternative in
> the first place.
So let's never switch to anything better than what we have now unless
we also support 1 or 2 alternatives simultaneously just to be safe. /s
Jeremy
Reply to: