Re: AGPLv3 Compliance and Debian Users
]] Howard Chu
> >>> If not, then
> >>> what is the point of the AGPL? To protect C-R-U?
> >>> I am not suggesting that this is absolutely not modification by Company A.
> >>> However, to a non-lawyer like me, it sure _looks_ like a big hole.
> I don't see any hole. If C-R-U did the modifications then they are
> obligated to publish the source code, by virtue of the fact that
> giving the modified code to Company A is distributing it.
They're only obliged to give the source to the people they distribute
the binaries to, or who accesses the system over a network, as I
understnad it? So Company A gets the source from C-R-U under those
terms and uses what they got, unmodified, from «upstream» and as I
understand this subthread, they're under no obligation to then publish
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are