Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT> writes: > On May 13, Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> wrote: > >> actually, while it has been brought up as a theoretical/wrong argument, that >> we cannot switch our linux installation ship with $this init system, while the >> kfreebsd port uses $that init system, I'd say nobody is seriously saying this >> now. We will support several init systems anyway. At least for jessie+X. > Maybe kfreebsd will do, but as I explained at FOSDEM I plan to make udev > depend on either upstart or systemd. > I would rather not be the one who will choose which one of them, so > I hope that we will get to a consensus about this. Do you really think that upstart is a viable option? No matter what the technical merits, the inevitable flame war regarding copyright assignment seems very likely to render upstart a non-starter as an essential element of Debian. Cheers, Phil. -- |)| Philip Hands [+44 (0)20 8530 9560] http://www.hands.com/ |-| HANDS.COM Ltd. http://www.uk.debian.org/ |(| 10 Onslow Gardens, South Woodford, London E18 1NE ENGLAND
Attachment:
pgpqi_GwlLWR8.pgp
Description: PGP signature