Re: Doubts about PPA in Debian
]] Brian May
> On 7 May 2013 17:03, Thomas Goirand <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > Now, if I had PPA, then I could follow upstream release cycles. Every 6
> > months, I would destroy the PPA for OpenStack stable -2, and create a
> > new stable PPA. I could put all the backport software I need in there.
> > No need to worry anymore about the release cycles not in sync with what
> > we do in Debian. Since most things are Python, I could still continue to
> > upload the modules into SID (or Experimental during the freeze), and as
> > the brilliant plan for the Debian PPA will not add duplication, it will
> > be "for free", just giving a list of packages that I wish to import.
> In what way would this be better then using Debian Backports?
Providing backports doesn't free you from the burden of making sure
upgrades work. Thomas is facing a very large chunk of work to make sure
upgrades from the no-longer-supported E release to whatever might be in
jessie, since upstream breaks APIs and doesn't support skipping releases
>From what I've understood from upstreams in the openstack community,
something like the ppamain concept would be welcome.
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are