Re: RFC declarative built-using field generation
Am 17.02.2013 20:41, schrieb Philipp Kern:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 12:41:26AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> Am 10.02.2013 23:31, schrieb Philipp Kern:
>>> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 03:01:21PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>>> But it is ok to insist on using the exact binary version for
>>>> build-depending on source packages when it's not needed? This only
>>>> seems to be driven by the current dak implementation.
>>> That doesn't make sense to me. Where did somebody require this?
>> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/01/msg00711.html maybe it's a
>> coincidence, however creduce was formerly rejected for not having a
>> Built-Using attribute, and gcj-4.8, gnat-4.7 and gnat-4.8 are still in
> Both links talk of Built-Using not Build-Depends. See above for what you
> wrote. ;-)
Sorry, I would like to share your amusement. So please explain.