[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFC declarative built-using field generation

On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 12:41:26AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Am 10.02.2013 23:31, schrieb Philipp Kern:
> > On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 03:01:21PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >> But it is ok to insist on using the exact binary version for
> >> build-depending on source packages when it's not needed? This only seems
> >> to be driven by the current dak implementation.
> > That doesn't make sense to me. Where did somebody require this?
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-gcc/2013/01/msg00012.html
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/01/msg00711.html
> maybe it's a coincidence, however creduce was formerly rejected for not having
> a Built-Using attribute, and gcj-4.8, gnat-4.7 and gnat-4.8 are still in NEW.

Both links talk of Built-Using not Build-Depends. See above for what you wrote.

Kind regards
Philipp Kern

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: