Re: RFC declarative built-using field generation
Am 10.02.2013 23:31, schrieb Philipp Kern:
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 03:01:21PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> But it is ok to insist on using the exact binary version for
>> build-depending on source packages when it's not needed? This only seems
>> to be driven by the current dak implementation.
> That doesn't make sense to me. Where did somebody require this?
maybe it's a coincidence, however creduce was formerly rejected for not having
a Built-Using attribute, and gcj-4.8, gnat-4.7 and gnat-4.8 are still in NEW.