Re: [RFC] Go (golang) packaging
"Bernhard R. Link" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> >> (and of course just “codesearch” for the binaries).
>> > I assume s/binaries/sources/? And I'd suggest to just not policy the
>> No, I really meant binaries, as in “cgrep”, “cindex” and “csearch” in
>> this specific case.
> And what is the name of the binary package those programs will be in?
“codesearch”, as I wrote.
>> > Another question: Have you considered asking for a archive Section for
>> > those packages? I guess with no special section yet all those packages
>> > would be section libdevel as they are for static linking only, wouldn't
>> > they?
>> As pabs has pointed out, I did that, but the general rule of thumb is
>> that we want to have lots of packages first and an archive section
> Too avoid packaging mistakes and to have the wording ready I'd suggest
> to already prepare the wording (I guess in the section later will be
> everything that is is now in libdevel plus golong toolchain packages,
> while everything providing programs to be in their respective section).
Which wording do you mean?