On 12-01-07 at 09:15am, Russ Allbery wrote: > Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@err.no> writes: > > ]] Daniel Baumann > > >> it's not policy incompliant if e.g. php5 would install > >> /etc/apache2/sites-enabled/whatever containing a virtualhost > >> definition. the reason why nobody would do that, is, that it's > >> just wrong and unreasonable to do such a thing (where e.g. aliases > >> and directory directives are a reasonable thing to do for a web > >> application). > > > Having, say, mediawiki, ask using debconf if you would like a vhost > > set up with the host name wiki.$domain would be completely sane, > > IMO. If you don't want it, just tell the config script no. > > Agreed, provided that the default action is no. I too feel that no webapp package should add vhosts by default. But does it violate Policy? The package jwchat currently enable a vhost by default, I believe. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature