Re: Really, about udev, not init sytsems
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 03:42:19PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > The point is, systemd and udev have recently been patched by upstream so
> > that things are going *even more* on the direction of having stuff
> > stored in /usr.
> Which is still not really a problem when tons of other daemons have
> done the same already. We're not "fixing" this by patching systemd and
> udev when many other daemons behave the same way. So, it's pointless
> anyway.
There are no "lots of other daemons" affected by this issue. It's only the
architecture of systemd and udev that trigger this problem.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/
slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Reply to:
- References:
- Gentoo guys starting a fork of udev
- From: Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>
- Re: Really, about udev, not init sytsems (was: Gentoo guys starting a fork of udev)
- From: Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>
- Re: Really, about udev, not init sytsems (was: Gentoo guys starting a fork of udev)
- From: Toni Mueller <toni@debian.org>
- Re: Really, about udev, not init sytsems (was: Gentoo guys starting a fork of udev)
- From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
- Re: Really, about udev, not init sytsems
- From: Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>
- Re: Really, about udev, not init sytsems
- From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
- Re: Really, about udev, not init sytsems
- From: Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>
- Re: Really, about udev, not init sytsems
- From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>