Re: [SUMMARY/PROPOSAL] Orphaning another maintainer's packages - maintainer's objection
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Le 26/10/2012 08:46, Bart Martens a écrit :
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 12:45:21PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> Gergely Nagy <algernon@balabit.hu> wrote: AIUI, with the current
>> proposal, as long as three DDs think it should be orphaned, the
>> maintainer's objection is irrelevant.
>
> I would send a "NACK because the maintainer objects", and I trust
> other DDs subscribed to debian-qa to do the same. The ITO
> procedure is not meant to replace the TC handling conflicts.
>
So why not agree now that the maintainer can veto the process?
Regards, Thibaut.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=2BdK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: