[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [SUMMARY/PROPOSAL] Orphaning another maintainer's packages - without objection versus requiring ACKs

Bart Martens <bartm@debian.org> wrote:

>On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 09:06:34AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> Why not start with a "without objection" standard and see how it
>The "without objection" approach would require a reasonable delay for
>people to
>raise objections (some say two months).  The ACK/NACK approach allows
>to reach
>a consensus in a shorter time, so that for obvious cases the salvaging
>proceed without pointless delay.

No.  Changing 3:1 ACK/NACK to 3 (or some other number) ACKS and no objections imposes no such constraint.

Scott K

Reply to: