[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [SUMMARY/PROPOSAL] Orphaning another maintainer's packages

Gergely Nagy <algernon@balabit.hu> wrote:

>Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes:
>> Whether a package is in need of greater attention is not a hard and
>> fast objective thing.  It's to a large part subjective.  Perhaps the
>> maintainer thinks it's more or less fine, or at least low enough
>> priority that the problems are tolerable.
>Then the maintainer has many options, including but not limited to
>NACK-ing the ITO. One has a lot of possibilities even before it comes
>filing an ITO.

AIUI, with the current proposal, as long as three DDs think it should be orphaned, the maintainer's objection is irrelevant.

Scott K

Reply to: