Re: amd64 as default architecture

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: amd64 as default architecture
From: Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@wrar.name>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 13:04:37 +0600
Message-id: <[🔎] 20120521070437.GB5024@belkar.wrar.name>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] jpcmou$10j$1@dough.gmane.org>
References: <[🔎] 20120520210223.GA13123@leaf> <[🔎] 1337556611.4107.380.camel@deadeye> <[🔎] 20120521004559.GA23494@falafel.plessy.net> <[🔎] jpcmou$10j$1@dough.gmane.org>

On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 02:19:09PM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> > By the way, are there plans to drop the support of the i386 architecture with
> > kFreeBSD as well ?
> I thought we were discussing amd64 being the default architecture for new
> installations, rather than the removal of the i386 architecture.
Both.

-- 
WBR, wRAR

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

References:
- Re: amd64 as default architecture
  - From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
- Re: amd64 as default architecture
  - From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
- Re: amd64 as default architecture
  - From: Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org>
- Re: amd64 as default architecture
  - From: Chow Loong Jin <hyperair@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: why do people introduce stup^Wstrange changes to quilt 3.0 format
Next by Date: Re: removal of Qt3
Previous by thread: Re: amd64 as default architecture
Next by thread: Re: amd64 as default architecture
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread