On 21/05/2012 08:45, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Mon, May 21, 2012 at 12:30:11AM +0100, Ben Hutchings a écrit : >> On Sun, 2012-05-20 at 14:02 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: >>> >>> I'd love to see that happen someday, but at the moment, new x86 systems >>> still get sold that don't support 64-bit. Notably, many low-power Atom >>> processors still don't support 64-bit. >> >> Right, though I think these are going into phones now, not netbooks. > > Fit-PC sells an excellent fanless mini-PC with an Atom Z510 that does not > support 64-bit instructions. It consumes 8 W according to the manufacturer, > which is less than some Arm-based plug computers. I am the happy owner of one > of them and would be quite sad to have to replace it in two years in order to > keep on using Debian Stable on my personal server. > > By the way, are there plans to drop the support of the i386 architecture with > kFreeBSD as well ? I thought we were discussing amd64 being the default architecture for new installations, rather than the removal of the i386 architecture. -- Kind regards, Loong Jin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature