Re: usefulness of ITPs (Re: mosh ITP not done, just package name taken over)
Jean-Christophe Dubacq <jcdubacq1@free.fr> writes:
> What about a dev. script that would be run in debian/ and would parse
> debian/control and send the ITP? I can write that!
The Perl group already has a script that does this: examples/get-itp
in git.debian.org:/git/pkg-perl/scripts.git. I don't use it myself and
it might not work that well with non-pkg-perl packages.
Regards,
Ansgar
Reply to:
- References:
- mosh ITP not done, just package name taken over
- From: Christoph Egger <christoph@debian.org>
- Re: mosh ITP not done, just package name taken over
- From: Christine Spang <christine@spang.cc>
- Re: mosh ITP not done, just package name taken over
- From: Christoph Egger <christoph@christoph-egger.org>
- Re: mosh ITP not done, just package name taken over
- From: Christoph Egger <christoph@christoph-egger.org>
- Re: mosh ITP not done, just package name taken over
- From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
- usefulness of ITPs (Re: mosh ITP not done, just package name taken over)
- From: "Eugene V. Lyubimkin" <jackyf@debian.org>
- Re: usefulness of ITPs (Re: mosh ITP not done, just package name taken over)
- From: Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de>
- Re: usefulness of ITPs (Re: mosh ITP not done, just package name taken over)
- From: Jon Dowland <jmtd@debian.org>
- Re: usefulness of ITPs (Re: mosh ITP not done, just package name taken over)
- From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
- Re: usefulness of ITPs (Re: mosh ITP not done, just package name taken over)
- From: Jean-Christophe Dubacq <jcdubacq1@free.fr>