Hi Henri, On 24/03/12 06:29, Henri Le Foll wrote: > A Team field should be added to debian/control. (and also to the .dsc) > ======================================================================= > > - I hope every package will one day belong to a team. > > - I think that each package in wnpp or rfa or rfh should belong to a > team (other than QA). If I need help on my package, why should it belong to a team when I file a RFH? > - Some information about the difficulty to maintain the package can > be automacally extracted from the source package and added to the dsc file. That's something that is incredibly subjective, bound to change as things arise, and of limited utility. A package in Perl might be more difficult for someone who only has Python experience, for example. > I am wrong in saying that information like : > > - a source package generates only one binary package > > - debian/rules is trivial. Tomorrow upstream could add a new feature which requires you to write all sorts of custom rules. > Three or more characters which could easily show the difficulty to > maintain the package. > AA0 for simple ones. > […] So I'd need a table to decipher the package difficulty? > B : only one file like copyright or control need attention What does this mean? -- Luke Faraone;; Debian & Ubuntu Developer; Sugar Labs, Systems lfaraone on irc.[freenode,oftc].net -- http://luke.faraone.cc PGP fprint: 5189 2A7D 16D0 49BB 046B DC77 9732 5DD8 F9FD D506
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature