Re: On init in Debian
]] Svante Signell
> On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 14:44 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > ]] Svante Signell
> > > Regarding who is expert or not, can the people who considers themselves
> > > as such (others shouldn't bother) do a _scientific_ comparison of the
> > > three alternatives with respect to important features. First step would
> > > be to write down which aspects are important, and continue from there.
> > > Also, practical experiments are needed to verify statements made.
> > I'd rather work on making systemd better and a better init system for
> > Debian than to satisfy some academic desire for a comparison of init
> > systems.
> How on earth would anybody be able to make a decision if there are no
> comparisons between the alternatives available?
It could be as simple as «the most popular/the one which people actually
ship units/jobs for is the one we'll move to».
> [...] This could be a useful GSoC task.
Given there's no code to write in such a report, I don't think it'd be
appropriate for gsoc.
> This would be much more intersting than writing a
> systemd-to-initscript converter.
This I disagree with, Debian doesn't work by people sitting down,
writing papers and then agreeing on a course of action. Debian works,
mostly, by people putting in effort and then documenting how others can
solve the same or similar problems.
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are