Re: upstart: please update to latest upstream version
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 08:07:37AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 02:44:45PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > On Mar 05, Marc Haber <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > > Should Debian restrict itself to being a Linux platform just to have
> > > systemd?
> > If it is worth it, yes.
> > Should Debian reject using <any widely deployed and important system
> > component> just to support toy ports which are used by a dozen of people?
> Except that kFreeBSD is not a toy port.
> FreeBSD is a serious operating system that is used by many people in
> system-critical applications, which runs on modern hardware and
> outperforms the hell of Linux in some regards.
It is Debian GNU/kFreeBSD being called a toy and not the FreeBSD
> The kFreeBSD port has some features over Linux that makes it an
> interesting option for some use cases, such as ZFS, jails, and more.
ZFS is interesting, yes. Linux device-mapper provides many of the
features but I recognise there can be a benefit from integrating these
into the filesystem iself. Any year now, btrfs may be mature enough
Do jails still provide features that LXC does not?
We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking.
- Albert Camus