Re: Teams in changelog trailers
Le Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 04:49:33PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf a écrit :
>
> There is a
> big difference between all of the changelog concerning you being:
>
> * Team upload.
>
> to it being
>
> * Team upload.
> * Fixed libquack linking with moox, depends: updated (Closes: #654321)
>
> For the first case, if you are part of the team (and Carlos is as
> well), just sponsor it and go on. But if you find something (trivial
> or not) to fix on the package, being part of the team should mean you
> don't have to list yourself in debian/control, and can just
> acknowledge it by mentioning "Team upload" in the changelog.
Here is the full diff:
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
-r-cran-proto (0.3-9.2-1) UNRELEASE; urgency=low
+r-cran-proto (0.3-9.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
+ * Team upload.
+
+ [ Carlos Borroto ]
* Initial release (Closes: #657994)
- -- Carlos Borroto <carlos.borroto@gmail.com> Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:34:31 -0500
+ -- Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org> Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:47:24 +0900
We prefer that packages that are not uploaded have "UNRELEASED" as distribution
name. So I had to set it to unstable when I uploaded (and committed a tag, and
commtited the build logs in the repository). Doing this I could have either
kept the changelog signature of Carlos with the old date, which would be
inaccurate, or change the date, but I do not feel changing the date on somebody
elses signature. I think that team uploads are more natural than sponsoring
when maintaining a source package in a team's VCS.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles
Reply to: