Re: Back to technical discussion? Yes! (was: network-manager as default? No!)

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Back to technical discussion? Yes! (was: network-manager as default? No!)
From: Sune Vuorela <nospam@vuorela.dk>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 14:29:41 +0000 (UTC)
Message-id: <[🔎] slrnipjlel.rvp.nospam@sshway.ssh.pusling.com>
References: <[🔎] 1301853382.3448.43.camel@pi0307572> <[🔎] 20110403201856.GA14280@kaiba.homelan> <[🔎] 1301866123.2967.52.camel@havelock.liw.fi> <[🔎] 20110403234229.GA27504@kaiba.homelan> <[🔎] 20110404052935.GB22879@apache.rbscorp.ru> <20110404061854.GG21476@rivendell.home.ouaza.com> <[🔎] 20110404065233.GA7643@apache.rbscorp.ru> <[🔎] 20110404070001.GA28108@virgil.dodds.net> <[🔎] 20110404075506.GA636@kaiba.homelan> <[🔎] 1301918712.3448.124.camel@pi0307572> <[🔎] 20110404133118.GA17213@kaiba.homelan>

> I do not think that reading documentation before trying to achieve
> something is that elitist. And in the case of wpa_supplicant, it is
> definitely not dozens of pages. Basically, it is just
>
> man interfaces
> man wpa_supplicant.conf
> zless /usr/share/doc/wpasupplicant/README.Debian.gz

I don't consider myself 'stupid user', but I haven't yet been able to
put my laptop on wpa network without the use of network manager.

/Sune

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Back to technical discussion? Yes! (was: network-manager as default? No!)
  - From: "Stefan Lippers-Hollmann" <s.L-H@gmx.de>
- Re: Back to technical discussion? Yes! (was: network-manager as default? No!)
  - From: Kelly Clowers <kelly.clowers@gmail.com>

References:
- Re: network-manager as default? No! (was: Bits from the Release Team - Kicking off Wheezy)
  - From: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>
- Re: network-manager as default? No! (was: Bits from the Release Team - Kicking off Wheezy)
  - From: Stanislav Maslovski <stanislav.maslovski@gmail.com>
- Flaming as a way to reach technical quality? No! (was: network-manager as default? No! (was: Bits from the Release Team - Kicking off Wheezy))
  - From: Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.fi>
- Re: Flaming as a way to reach technical quality? No! (was: network-manager as default? No! (was: Bits from the Release Team - Kicking off Wheezy))
  - From: Stanislav Maslovski <stanislav.maslovski@gmail.com>
- Re: Flaming as a way to reach technical quality? No! (was: network-manager as default? No! (was: Bits from the Release Team - Kicking off Wheezy))
  - From: "Dmitry E. Oboukhov" <unera@debian.org>
- Re: Flaming as a way to reach technical quality? No! (was: network-manager as default? No! (was: Bits from the Release Team - Kicking off Wheezy))
  - From: "Dmitry E. Oboukhov" <unera@debian.org>
- Re: Flaming as a way to reach technical quality? No! (was: network-manager as default? No! (was: Bits from the Release Team - Kicking off Wheezy))
  - From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Back to technical discussion? Yes! (was: network-manager as default? No!)
  - From: Stanislav Maslovski <stanislav.maslovski@gmail.com>
- Re: Back to technical discussion? Yes! (was: network-manager as default? No!)
  - From: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>
- Re: Back to technical discussion? Yes! (was: network-manager as default? No!)
  - From: Stanislav Maslovski <stanislav.maslovski@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Back to technical discussion
Next by Date: Re: Bug#620821: ITP: vpnautoconnect -- Automatically reconnect VPNs created by NetworkManager
Previous by thread: Re: Back to technical discussion? Yes!
Next by thread: Re: Back to technical discussion? Yes! (was: network-manager as default? No!)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread