Re: directory under /usr/bin -- Ok or not?
well -- correct but ...
,---
| http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#LIBLTQUALGTALTERNATEFORMATESSENTIAL
| /lib<qual> : Alternate format essential shared libraries (optional)
| Purpose
|
| There may be one or more variants of the /lib directory on systems which support more than one binary format requiring separate libraries. [14]
| Requirements
|
| If one or more of these directories exist, the requirements for their contents are the same as the normal /lib directory, except that /lib<qual>/cpp is not required. [15]
`---
discussion about having /lib/libexec in Debian has happened around 5-6 years
ago and it was agreed just to dump everything under the universal dump --
/usr/lib
On Thu, 03 Nov 2011, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > Isn't /usr/libexec for "internal use" exetutables?
> In the GNU coding standards and on Red Hat-based distributions, yes; in the
> FHS (and hence Debian), no. (libexec isn't specified by the FHS.)
--
=------------------------------------------------------------------=
Keep in touch www.onerussian.com
Yaroslav Halchenko www.ohloh.net/accounts/yarikoptic
Reply to: