Re: Maintainers, porters, and burden of porting
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 11:57 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
[...]
> But a different thread library that has clear POSIX compliance bugs[*]
> is the kind of things that make me fear that many more packages than we
> see currently are broken on kfreebsd. And I'm not sure that it's where
> we want to spend our manpower.
>
> [*] due to linuxthreads: #639658 [kfreebsd] waitpid from a thread does
> not work for child processes created by other threads.
> there's also some signals+thread fun.
Of course, Linux had those bugs for many years, so most multithreaded
programs that run on Linux are probably tolerant of them.
Ben.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: Maintainers, porters, and burden of porting
- From: Bernd Zeimetz <bernd@bzed.de>
- Re: Maintainers, porters, and burden of porting
- From: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net>
- Re: Maintainers, porters, and burden of porting
- From: Bernd Zeimetz <bernd@bzed.de>
- Re: Maintainers, porters, and burden of porting
- From: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net>
- Re: Maintainers, porters, and burden of porting
- From: Bernd Zeimetz <bernd@bzed.de>
- Re: Maintainers, porters, and burden of porting
- From: Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.fi>
- Re: Maintainers, porters, and burden of porting
- From: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net>
- Re: Maintainers, porters, and burden of porting
- From: Bernd Zeimetz <bernd@bzed.de>
- Re: Maintainers, porters, and burden of porting
- From: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net>
- Re: Maintainers, porters, and burden of porting
- From: Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>
- Re: Maintainers, porters, and burden of porting
- From: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net>