Re: Maintainers, porters, and burden of porting
Lucas Nussbaum, le Wed 31 Aug 2011 12:25:24 +0200, a écrit :
> So, it's a really interesting project, but not really a proof of
> widespread kfreebsd usage in high-demand production environments like
> you seem to imply ;)
Well, I didn't want to imply anything at all, just that it was a
decision that made sense.
It's just the usual problem of wanting to write hundreds of mails per
day, you can't spend time to provide the whole background.
Samuel
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: Maintainers, porters, and burden of porting
- From: Bernd Zeimetz <bernd@bzed.de>
- Re: Maintainers, porters, and burden of porting
- From: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net>
- Re: Maintainers, porters, and burden of porting
- From: Bernd Zeimetz <bernd@bzed.de>
- Re: Maintainers, porters, and burden of porting
- From: Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.fi>
- Re: Maintainers, porters, and burden of porting
- From: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net>
- Re: Maintainers, porters, and burden of porting
- From: Bernd Zeimetz <bernd@bzed.de>
- Re: Maintainers, porters, and burden of porting
- From: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net>
- Re: Maintainers, porters, and burden of porting
- From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
- Re: Maintainers, porters, and burden of porting
- From: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>
- Re: Maintainers, porters, and burden of porting
- From: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net>