[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: A few observations about systemd



Am 22.07.2011 15:32, schrieb Russell Coker:
> On Fri, 22 Jul 2011, Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@err.no> wrote:
>> Another would be to ship three systemd units, one being «smtp», one
>> being «queue runner» a third being «smtp+queue runner» or just generate
>> the .service file dynamically based on what the admin configures through
>> debconf.
> 
> If there were systemd units for smtp and the queue runner then the sysadmin 
> could easily request systemd to stop one without the other.

If you want to avoid that you can bind those units together via BindTo [1].
This way, if one of the units is stopped, the other(s) will be stopped too.

Cheers,
Michael

[1] http://0pointer.de/public/systemd-man/systemd.unit.html
-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: