On Sun, 10 Apr 2011 15:25:09 +0200, David Paleino wrote: > On Sun, 10 Apr 2011 14:55:12 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > > Le dimanche 10 avril 2011 à 12:54 +0200, David Paleino a écrit : > > > Also, we're currently targetting bash >= 3.2, so we need to take care of > > > backwards compatibility. > > > For 2.0, we're probably bumping that requirement to >= 4.1, so we can use > > > newer bash features, which will hopefully make things faster. > > > > With bash 4.1 in squeeze, what’s the point of waiting? > > Debian != world, and since I'm upstream too... :) (It's even true that, as someone said on the upstream ML, "when Debian stable has X, everyone else has X+1"...) -- . ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://deb.li/dapal `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature