On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 08:06:12AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> I just filed an ITP on systemd and am planning on
Amazing!, thanks for this.
> making it installable alongside with sysvinit, switchable with
> init=/sbin/systemd when booting. Eventually, I guess either using
> alternatives for /sbin/init or dpkg-divert-ing it away from sysvinit
> might be the way to go. Either way, whether sysvinit is Essential or
> not is a bit irrelevant to whether people can experiment with other
> init systems.
I've just read a few days ago the design document of systemd; AFAIU it
requires anyhow patching various daemons, no matter how trivial the
patches are.
Do you have any experience or feeling on how usable it would be today in
a Debian unstable box? Can we imagine having it as an alternative init
which a Squeeze user might want to try, obtaining something more than a
machine that simply doesn't boot half of the machine services?
Many thanks for your work on this,
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..| . |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie
sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature