Re: packages being essential but having stuff in /usr/?!
On 07/15/2010 09:07 PM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 19:26 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> It's been reported as bug #428189 already, but without any followup.
>> See also #532324.
> Well while 532324 is a perfect example how some developers obviously
> think they can ignore the policy just as they like (this issue is really
> unbelievable,... wonder why we have all that policy crap...) in order to
> save them work...
If the policy does not fit reality, then it should be changed *or* (which is
what I'd prefer), the package needs to be fixed.
Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer
GPG Fingerprints: 06C8 C9A2 EAAD E37E 5B2C BE93 067A AD04 C93B FF79
ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F