On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 20:15 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > No, and there doesn't need to be. Now can you stop beating this dead > horse? It would like to rot in hell unharmed. Wow,... supposing that you speak for Debian,... this reaction is really ... "interesting"... Always thought that Debian would be an open project,... so - either I'm wrong with my assumptions on the policy and one could (being so "open") explain the where and why... - or I'm right,.. than there's somewhere some problem, either in the policy,.. or the package... But just saying "go away,... I don't wanna know anything"... and ignoring that there are e.g. non-dash/bash shells which conform to the policy as a /bin/sh but still would break here... this is really Drepper-ism in it's purest form :) Thank your for that ... uhm... entertainment... Best wishes, Chris.
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature