Re: Bindv6only once again
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Michael Poole <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> The behavior with net.ipv6.bindv6only=0 is mandated by both POSIX and
> the governing RFC. How can you call it a bug for software to expect
> that behavior? The true bug is that Debian intentionally violates these
> standards. If people decide (as Vincent Bernat suggested) that Debian
> is a buggy piece of junk because of that, they will be right.
How many times will this discussion will go round and round in
circles? I'm getting dizzy.