[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bindv6only once again

On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Michael Poole <mdpoole@troilus.org> wrote:

> The behavior with net.ipv6.bindv6only=0 is mandated by both POSIX and
> the governing RFC.  How can you call it a bug for software to expect
> that behavior?  The true bug is that Debian intentionally violates these
> standards.  If people decide (as Vincent Bernat suggested) that Debian
> is a buggy piece of junk because of that, they will be right.

How many times will this discussion will go round and round in
circles? I'm getting dizzy.



Reply to: