Re: RFH: bashisms in configure script
On 25/05/10 at 23:10 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Tue, 25 May 2010 16:13:36 -0500
> Raphael Geissert <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> A much more sane list is in the bug report:
> 124 source packages. Bad, but not as crazy as 1,540.
> (I've heard of off-by-one errors but off-by-one-order-of-magnitude is a
No. 124 is the number of packages that failed to build. Not the number
of source packages that silently generated incorrect binary packages.