Re: RFH: bashisms in configure script
On 26/05/10 08:07, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 25/05/10 at 23:10 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
>> 124 source packages. Bad, but not as crazy as 1,540.
>>
>> (I've heard of off-by-one errors but off-by-one-order-of-magnitude is a
>> stretch.)
>
> No. 124 is the number of packages that failed to build. Not the number
> of source packages that silently generated incorrect binary packages.
Right. That's exactly why I suggested debdiffing the resulting binary packages
from a new and an old dash.
Emilio
Reply to: