Re: bindv6only again

To: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: bindv6only again
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.jussieu.fr>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 15:33:42 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 87iq6sylhl.fsf@pirx.pps.jussieu.fr>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20100508234524.GA9582@scru.org> (Clint Adams's message of "Sat, 8 May 2010 23:45:24 +0000")
References: <20100426194648.GA21569@bongo.bofh.it> <20100427113956.GD30835@paranoidfreak.co.uk> <20100427114331.GB28949@bongo.bofh.it> <[🔎] 4BE0A947.3070803@free.fr> <[🔎] slrnhu26ut.44q.trash@kelgar.0x539.de> <[🔎] 4BE16437.30205@free.fr> <[🔎] 20100508172539.GA16813@bongo.bofh.it> <[🔎] 4BE5A251.7040901@thykier.net> <[🔎] 2fl632yckfe.fsf@login2.uio.no> <[🔎] 4BE5E2AA.8090105@free.fr> <[🔎] 20100508234524.GA9582@scru.org>

>> What if it is just installed from the tarball?

> Then that person is still using buggy, non-free software.

Proprietary, granted, but why buggy?  bindv6only=0 is assumed by both
POSIX and RFC 3493.

--jch

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: bindv6only again
  - From: Salvo Tomaselli <tiposchi@tiscali.it>
- Re: bindv6only again
  - From: Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@err.no>

References:
- Re: bindv6only again
  - From: Vincent Danjean <vdanjean.ml@free.fr>
- Re: bindv6only again
  - From: Philipp Kern <trash@philkern.de>
- Re: bindv6only again
  - From: Vincent Danjean <vdanjean.ml@free.fr>
- Re: bindv6only again
  - From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
- Re: bindv6only again
  - From: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
- Re: bindv6only again
  - From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
- Re: bindv6only again
  - From: Jean-Christophe Dubacq <jcdubacq1@free.fr>
- Re: bindv6only again
  - From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: UPG and the default umask
Next by Date: Re: bindv6only again
Previous by thread: Re: bindv6only again
Next by thread: Re: bindv6only again
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread